F1 rear wings utilize an adjustable flap (DRS) to reduce aerodynamic drag during straightaways. During the 2026 F1 season, Ferrari introduced an active-aero "Macarena Wing" that rotates up to 230 degrees to flip upside down, significantly stalling airflow to boost straight-line speed.
For my ME495 Aerodynamics final project, I worked in a group of 3 to model and perform CFD analysis on this rotating mechanism. We characterized the intense loads, pressure differentials, and turbulent aerodynamic behavior during this actuation.
Primary Software: OnShape, Ansys SpaceClaim, Ansys Fluent
Key Focus Areas: drag reduction systems (DRS), Von Karman vortex shedding, transient CFD analysis
Watch on YouTube: Macarena in Action
Macarena Rear Wing
Goal: Create a fluid domain representing the 3-element rear wing for CFD simulation.
Execution:
Modeled the 3D simplified rear wing full assembly in OnShape.
Designed the three individual rear-wing components using specific NACA profiles: 7412 for the mainplane, 4412 for the middle flap, 6409 for the top flap.
Extracted the 2D airfoil profiles into DWG format and generated static global and rotating fluid domains using SpaceClaim.
Rear Wing Full Assembly
Rear Wing Airfoil Elements
2D Airfoil Profiles for 2D Analysis
Fluid Domain in SpaceClaim
Mesh of Fluid Domain (circular region can rotate)
Goal: Quantify the exact drag reduction and downforce penalties across 3 fixed-wing states at a 65 m/s inlet velocity.
Execution:
Element sizing: 1e-4 m near airfoil edges to improve boundary layer and pressure gradient resolution, 5e-4 m on outer fluid domain edges to balance computational cost with solution accuracy away from airfoil
Results:
Unopened Configuration: Generated 2105 of downward force and 427 N of drag.
Mid-Actuation (130°): Downward force dropped to 1176 N, but drag spiked significantly to 740 N. This temporary spike occurs because the upright rotating flap acts as a vertical bluff body and airbrakes against the airflow.
Fully Inverted (230°): Successfully reduced drag to just 65 N, while downward force settled at 612 N. This validates the drag-reduction strategy for straight-line speed when the inverted configuration is used.
Triangular Meshing
Turbulence, Static Pressure, and Velocity (top to bottom) Comparisons across Three Macarena Configurations
Goal: Capture the chaotic flow, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), and pressure fluctuations that occur during the physical rotation of the Macarena wing.
Execution:
Configured a sliding-mesh transient simulation in Ansys Fluent where the mainplane remained fixed within the global domain, while the middle and top flaps rotated together within a refined rotating fluid domain.
Applied a pressure-based K-Omega SST model over a 3-second simulation time. We used 0.003s time steps to capture as high-fidelity flow separation as we could.
Vortex Shedding: We observed aggressive Von Karman vortex shedding in the wake when the flap hit the perfectly perpendicular position. The alternating shedding of separated shear layers produced strong periodic vortices.
Structural Loading: We characterized massive transient structural loading and intense pressure disturbances during the movement phases. This proved that the mechanism undergoes extreme hinge moments before reattaching flow and settling into the low-drag inverted configuration.
Ansys Transient Simulation Setup
Macarena Velocity Animation Screenshots
High-Fidelity Transient Resolution: Reduced the simulation time step to 0.003s across 3,000 timesteps, successfully capturing continuous Von Kármán vortex shedding throughout the entire 3-second actuation.
Critical Mid-Actuation Loads: Identified that a perfectly perpendicular flap acts as a bluff body, forcing violent flow separation. This produces strong periodic vortices, a wider wake, intense pressure fluctuations, and peak unsteady hinge moments.
Stabilized Inverted State: Demonstrated that once fully opened, the flow reattaches and the wake narrows significantly. The mechanism resumes airfoil-like behavior, dampening vortex shedding and stabilizing aerodynamic loads.
Macarena Turbulence Animation Screenshots
Baseline Aerodynamic Stability: The unopened flap configuration maintains an airfoil-like, stable aerodynamic state, with lower, highly localized TKE primarily confined to the slot and trailing edge.
Peak Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE): Mid-actuation generates massive TKE around the upright flap and throughout its wake, reinforcing that this halfway position induces the most severe unsteady aerodynamic loading.
Oscillating Pressure Disturbances: Pressure contours of the upright flap reveal intense windward stagnation paired with oscillating low pressure on the leeward side. This alternating pressure pattern perfectly correlates with the vortex shedding observed in the velocity and TKE plots.
Static Pressure Animation
Turbulence Animation
Velocity Animation
Downforce & Coefficent of Drag Graphs Comparing DRS vs. Macarena
Both the downforce and CD plots of the DRS mechanism show a smoother transition during actuation than the Macarena mechanism. We can see the expected reduction in drag and downforce for the Macarena mechanism here. We also see spikes in downforce and CD for the Macarena mechanism that correspond to the upright position of the rotating flap during actuation. This introduces much structural loading during the actuation phases.